Pete’s Accountable Blog

Creating real goals, real progress, and real conversations.

Sleeping on the job = “strategically disengaging”

by Pete Mockaitis on May 5, 2010

sleeperI sometimes see parts of my audience squirm at the word “accountability.” To the fiercely independent, the word can bring up this image of a boss breathing down their necks, watching their computers, and micromanaging. People who prefer to do things their own way at their own pace shudder at the thought of someone getting all up in their business.

Understandably so. When people are watching your work, it feels like there’s an unspoken pressure and expectation to constantly be making productive, nonstop, linear progress. However, ample research suggests linearity is a loser. Instead, taking regular breaks increases overall efficiency and effectiveness. Much of this great research and practical tips are presented in The Other 90% and The Power of Full Engagement (two of my favorites).

The authors of the latter speak of the power of being “strategically disengaged,” or deliberately choosing not to work in order to work more effectively. I personally love this verbiage and principle, and the science backs it up further. Take a look:

  • In 1998, the US Army tested two gunnery crews to see which shooters would land more shells on a target over a three-day window. One group went shooting non-stop. The other group had pre-scheduled, intermittent naps. The nappers actually landed more hits, even though they spent less time shooting. (Plus they got to sleep, which probably irked the other group who stayed up for three straight days. Burn!)
  • Long stretches of sitting is linked to diseases such as diabetes, cancer, and heart disease.
  • Humans have recurring, physiologically discernible cycles (called circadian and ultradian rhythms) in which our brain-wave activity, heart rates, and hormonal levels vary—making us crave a rest period every 90-120 minutes. It’s what the body naturally needs!
  • Students remember more material covered at the beginning and end of study sessions (the primacy and recency effects). Interspersing breaks creates more, shorter sessions to evoke more of these effects.

So walk around, take a nap, breathe, stretch, hydrate, pump some tunes. Tell the over-watching boss you’re going to “strategically disengage” in order to “harness the power of slumber.” That can feel a whole lot more empowering than, “I’m gonna stop working to take a nap.” Just be careful not to take it too far like George Costanza. This sort of behavior could result in your employer strategically disengaging your paycheck:

And to preempt the comments…I’ll tackle the question head-on: “Pete, I suppose you were just ‘strategically disengaged’ during these post-less months of blog absence, then?” Yes. Thanks for asking!

Stay in touch!

FaceBook-iconTwitter-icon

Bookmark and Share

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

JP May 5, 2010 at 10:02 am

I’ve been working on taking more breaks. It has helped me be more productive, but also happier over all. My office has no windows, so I try to go outside for a walk or something to catch some rays and get some Vitamin D flowing. It helps a lot! Good post!

Pete Mockaitis May 6, 2010 at 2:30 pm

Thanks JP… Yes, light can make a big difference. I also recommend natural or full-spectrum lighting indoors. GE Reveal and/or Einstein light-bulbs look really sharp. I wish you many productive bouts of strategic disengagement!

Dee Fife May 7, 2010 at 11:27 pm

Pete, this is hits a nerve. It totally depends on the individual. For many strategically disengaged means checked out and soon to be unemployed. Flexibility, creativity, game playing, guitar hero, sunshine breaks and plain water cooler breaks are key. But, for many they fail to hit the productivity aspect as effectively as they hit the ‘disengagement time.’ People must be accountable themselves by over delivering rather than consistently under delivering or just squeaking by to make this a valid approach to business ops.

Pete Mockaitis May 11, 2010 at 12:54 pm

Dee, thanks for your candor. Indeed, my headline was rather tongue-in-cheek. You’re dead on. There’s nothing strategic whatsoever about being totally checked out. If you can’t trust folks to be doing the right things while they’re conscious, any disengagement on their part is naturally suspect. That accountability is totally key. Workplace relations and productivity might be enhanced if bosses/underlings proactively addressed how increased personal accountability enables greater flexibility…to strategically disengage or just do work on their own terms.

Leave a Comment